Friday, May 24, 2024

How Do I Research My Church's Involvement with Slavery? Part 3: Colonial Era

Continued from Part 2: Getting Oriented...


PART 3: Colonial Era Considerations and Leads

The importance of research into colonial era history for the churches founded during that period is clear, but many churches founded later should also be doing this work for a number of reasons. Firstly, because many churches founded later were birthed, or planted, with the support of a colonial era parish.[1] Thus, the financial establishment of the founding parish and its relation to slavery is relevant for the financial establishment of the later parish. Not only so, but the Church of England established as many preaching stations as churches in New Jersey during the colonial era.[2] Many of these preaching stations went on to develop into churches after the colonial era, but prior to becoming churches, the preaching stations were supported by colonial priests and established parishes, many of whom participated in New Jersey’s plantation economy, to say nothing of those lay Anglicans who directly supported the preaching station ministry.[3] Moreover, a number of churches in our diocese today were formed from mergers with colonial or early-republic-era parishes,[4] and certainly the diocese itself has received the proceeds on occasion from the liquidation of colonial era church property.[5]

            So, clearly, many parishes beyond those parishes founded in the colonial era should be engaged in colonial era research in order to best understand, not only their dependence in their founding upon funds from enslaved labor, but also the ideological and theological positions and presuppositions that shaped the diocese from its outset and which produced the culture and attitudes of its later churches. But what should be considered in such research? What should researchers be aware of?

            As we’ve described elsewhere,[6] slavery was not merely legal, but was encouraged both by the Crown, and by many elite Anglicans and priests. The legal system was set up, in part by Anglicans, to enable it, and the system of law enforcement, in which Anglicans were often influential,[7] worked to ensure its smooth functioning. Most agriculture in New Jersey’s plantation economy was occurring at the subsistence level. That means that farming of any large property involved the use of either hired labor, or, more typically, enslaved labor. Many churches derived income from “glebes,” a term for church owned agricultural lands rented out for farming. Such large-scale agriculture on church lands also typically involved enslaved labor.

            The Society for the Propagation of the Gospel (SPG) was the Anglican organization sending priests to the colonies at this time. Its funding was partly derived from the operations of its large plantation in Barbados, which was run using the labor of hundreds of enslaved Africans at a time. Thus all income for those priests serving in New Jersey in the colonial era was derived, in part, from profits of enslaved labor.[8]

            As can be seen from these general observations, the structures of oppression operating through the use of enslavement in the plantation economy of colonial New Jersey were clearly intertwined with many aspects of Church funding and life. Though many records from the colonial era have been lost, the overall picture of New Jersey society generally, and the Anglican Church specifically, allow many conclusions to be drawn about individual colonial era churches’ complicity in slavery. However, the further details on a church by church basis matter a great deal and it cannot be said that more than a start has been made in parish-level research. As such, many historical resources for tracing parish histories in this research area have yet to be analyzed.

            Of course, the most critical information to gather at the outset is information about who the leaders and members of each congregation were. A few parishes still have parish registers from the colonial era and these should be digitized for the benefit of future researchers. Such registers sometimes contain information about baptisms of the enslaved. In some instances the Diocese holds scans of early documents in its archives.[9] Regarding colonial era New Jersey priests, the most exhaustive primary sources available are the SPG letter archives. Nelson Burr’s The Anglican Church in New Jersey[10] is a helpful reference for finding leads as you are starting to work with this archive, but the archives themselves are directly available as digital scans through the British Archives Online.[11] Various other sources of information are available for learning about parish leadership as well. The most widely accessible are early New Jersey legal documents, including Church-related legal documents such as charters and deeds. These have often been published and many are available online,[12] but also through local libraries, state archives, and research libraries. Such documents often list lay church leaders who were party to or witnesses of legal proceedings, but also furnish useful information about church property.[13]

            Once it has been determined who was involved with a particular church, research can begin on the ways those specific individuals were involved with enslavement. There are a variety of possible avenues for investigation. Due to the increasing interest in New Jersey’s history of slavery, many institutions have begun to work to collect and organize their records that help illuminate that history. Among these are local libraries, historical societies, museums,[14] municipal and county governments,[15] colleges and universities,[16] and the State of New Jersey.[17] Local institutions may be able to point you to relevant resources on the colonial history of slavery in your area. Some of these records have been formally published, and some excellent resources have been made available online. Often at least a record of the existence of records can be found through many institutional websites, especially at universities and the state level. Evidence of engaging in enslavement can be found in escaped slave advertisements from newspapers,[18] in census documents, in wills,[19] and a variety of other colonial era legal documents. 

            Don’t forget that it is important to consider not merely direct engagement in enslavement in your research, but support for the institution. Many Anglicans helped to pass the legal codes that established slavery and benefitted and protected enslavers. Others supported the institution through public advocacy in newspapers,[20] or enforced it as agents of the state. Many inherited wealth produced through enslavement. These relationships matter for understanding all the ways that Anglicans made slavery an integral part of life in the colony. And research should not be limited to New Jersey only. In many cases, wealthy Anglicans owned property in multiple colonies. New Jersey at the time was very closely linked both to New York City and to Philadelphia, and so consideration must be given to records from those regions as well.


Jolyon G. R. Pruszinski, Ph.D.
Reparations Commission Research Historian
Episcopal Diocese of New Jersey


[1] For instance, the now defunct St. Mary’s, Colestown (founded in 1703), at the time of its destruction by fire in 1899, was considered a “mother church” by many nearby Camden area churches (Burr, The Anglican Church in New Jersey, 573).

[2] Burr, The Anglican Church in New Jersey, 114-15.

[3] See, for example the brief history of Trinity Church, Princeton published in the DNJRJRhttps://dionj-racialjusticereview.blogspot.com/2023/04/trinity-church-princeton-and-slavery.html.

[4] For instance, St. Elizabeth’s Episcopal Church in Elizabeth, NJ was formed through serial mergers incorporating a number of historic congregations including Christ Church, Elizabeth (formed 1853) and Trinity Church, Elizabeth (formed in 1859). 

[5] Such as from the liquidation of the property of Christ Church, Allentown around 1940 (founded in 1730).

[7] Including through the system of jails and sheriffs.

[8] The initial bounty paid to priests when they were first sent, known as the King’s or Queen’s Bounty, also came partly as a result of the Crown’s monopoly profits from the Atlantic slave trade.

[9] Reach out to the diocesan archivist and historiographer, as of the date of publication, Rev. Cn. Richard Wrede, to see what he can find for you in the diocesan archives.

[10] Although there are significant problems with how Burr deals with slavery and racism. See the recent review which appears in DNJRJRhttps://dionj-racialjusticereview.blogspot.com/2023/11/review-anglican-church-in-new-jersey-by.html.

[12] https://www.google.com/books has many of these. A good start can be made with Documents Relating to the Colonial History of New Jersey, a multivolume series published from the archives of the State of New Jersey which is in the public domain. See also New Jersey, Laws of the State of New Jersey (New Brunswick: Abraham Blauvelt, 1800).

[13] If you are having trouble knowing where to start, or have difficulty finding much about the early years of your colonial church, Nelson Burr’s The Anglican Church in New Jersey (Philadelphia: The Church Historical Society, 1954), focuses on the colonial era, and is held in many Episcopal church libraries in the state. While it is not a great guide to issues of slavery and racism, it does reference many useful primary documents, and if you can read between the lines and filter its rosy perspective, it can provide some helpful leads, at the very least providing some information on key early leaders in most churches. You can then research the ties these individuals have to slavery.

[14] E.g. the Morven Museum: https://www.morven.org/slavery-at-morven

[15] E.g. the "Gloucester County Slavery Records" at http://www.westjerseyhistory.org/docs/gloucesterrecs/slavery/.

[16] E.g. Rutgers University (https://scarletandblack.rutgers.edu/), Monmouth University (https://guides.monmouth.edu/RaceRacismPolicing) , Princeton University (https://slavery.princeton.edu), and Princeton Theological Seminary (https://slavery.ptsem.edu).

[18] Many of which have been published in Richard B. Marrin, ed., Runaways of Colonial New Jersey: Indentured Servants, Slaves, Deserters, and Prisoners, 1720-1781 (Westminster, MD: Heritage Books, 2007), and Graham Russell Hodges and Alan Edward Brown, eds., “Pretends to Be Free”: Runaway Slave Advertisements from Colonial and Revolutionary New York and New Jersey (New York: Garland, 1994).

[19] See, for example, Harry B Weiss, The Personal Estates of Early Farmers and Tradesmen of Colonial New Jersey, 1670-1750 (Trenton: New Jersey Agricultural Society, 1971).

[20] Many archival resources for period newspapers are available online, including the databases developed through the National Digital Newspaper Program https://www.loc.gov/ndnp/. Various online resources for digitized archival newspapers can be accessed through most local libraries. Many sermons and other publications appear in the “Eighteenth Century Short Title Catalogue” and the “Nineteenth Century Short Title Catalogue,” resources also accessible through many library systems.

Monday, May 20, 2024

How Do I Research My Church's Involvement with Slavery? Part 2: Getting Oriented

Continued from Part 1: Limitations...

PART 2: Getting Oriented
At the outset it is important to familiarize yourself with the general and local history of the period you are researching. Read through the research that has already been done, both by the Diocese and by other researchers. Be sure to read through the Diocese of New Jersey Racial Justice Review, especially those articles related to colonial-era history or your local area. There are several helpful books that have been published on the colonial and antebellum history of this region, slavery in this region, and Black history of New Jersey. Familiarize yourself with them. Here are a few to get you started:


Rick Geffken, Stories of Slavery in New Jersey (Charleston, SC: The History Press, 2021).

James Gigantino, The Ragged Road to Abolition: Slavery and Freedom in New Jersey, 1775-1865 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015).

Travis Glasson, Mastering Christianity: Missionary Anglicanism and Slavery in the Atlantic World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).

Graham Hodges, Slavery and Freedom in the Rural North: African Americans in Monmouth County, New Jersey, 1665-1865 (Madison: Madison House, 1997).

Graham Hodges, Black New Jersey: 1664 to the Present Day (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2018.

(Continued in Part 3: Colonial Era)


Jolyon G. R. Pruszinski, Ph.D.
Reparations Commission Research Historian
Episcopal Diocese of New Jersey

Friday, May 17, 2024

How Do I Research My Church's Involvement with Slavery? Part 1: Limitations

If you belong to a colonial or ante-bellum-era Episcopal church in the Diocese of New Jersey and want to begin to investigate your church’s ties to slavery and racism, we want to help. There is so much work to be done to uncover and document this under-acknowledged history and the prospect of beginning the work can feel daunting. Where does one start? What should be considered? Here are a few thoughts and resources to get you started.

Christ Church, Shrewsbury, a historic congregation in the Diocese of New Jersey that has conducted
significant research on its ties to slavery (DpshermanChrist Church (Episcopal)CC BY-SA 4.0).

PART 1: Limitations
        It will help to begin by admitting that you are not going to find everything out. There is a lot that happened for which there is no documentary evidence. And even if there once was documentary evidence, a great deal of it has been lost or destroyed, and much that remains has yet to be catalogued (and as a result is very hard to find, or to even know that it exists). Research programs of this kind must admit their own limitations. Any researcher attempting to paint a picture of the past will paint, at best, a partial picture of what happened. That picture may be (and hopefully will be) representative, but it will not be exhaustive. The limitations of the research endeavor are important to acknowledge, and even as the limitations of the process may be disappointing to a beginning researcher, it is nevertheless important to discover and document what can be found. To discover what can be known about what happened regarding slavery and racism, even with the limitations on what can be known, is necessary for the process of repentance and repair. 
        It is also important to understand the limits of your research for knowing how to speak responsibly about your work. Sweeping generalizations have a way of being inaccurate, while carefully caveated and contextualized reporting is inherently more defensible, and therefore, valuable. You are only making a beginning, but a responsible beginning is far better than, on the one hand, inaccurately claiming to give the final word, or, on the other, giving up entirely because you will not be able to give the final word.
Moreover, it is critical to understand the limitations of your context. The vast majority of churches in the Diocese of New Jersey are, and have been, overwhelmingly White. If this is your context you must understand that this is a limited context from which to research. Looking through your parish records, or looking into the actions of historic parish leaders will only get you so far. 
        One of the key dynamics at play in this New Jersey church history of slavery and racism is that White people have often produced institutions, communities, and spaces that have alienated Black people. That means that in the records of Episcopal churches in New Jersey there is often little overt mention of Black people, or the treatment of Black people. That doesn’t mean that there were no Black people, or that nothing can be known of Black people, or that Black people were treated well. It simply means that Episcopal church sources, generally, are under-reporting the Black experience. Thus, as a source for the information on how Black people were treated, Episcopal church records, while a necessary element of the research program, are very limited. White churches are institutions generationally shaped by White ideas, assumptions, biases, and decisions. In order to work to overcome these structural limitations as much as possible, White researchers from White churches will need to look beyond their own experience and institutions. They will need to look for sources and stories from their broader local community, surrounding communities and their larger region, non-Episcopal churches, and secular historical sources. They will need to work to overcome the separation of their church community from the records they need. This separation is the result of generations of unjust actions that have alienated their church communities from the people they have hurt. Much of this story is housed outside the church, and if one is to uncover and attempt to tell this story, and to admit the church’s role in that hurt, a great deal of humility is required. It is not only your story. It is not even primarily your story. Tread lightly. Be sensitive. Be willing to learn. Be willing to apologize. Know that your own biases limit your understanding and caveat the products of your research accordingly.


Jolyon G. R. Pruszinski, Ph.D.
Reparations Commission Research Historian
Episcopal Diocese of New Jersey

Wednesday, May 15, 2024

NEWS: The Church Pension Group Publishes Slavery Audit of Episcopal Church Funds


The Church Pension Group (CPG), which runs the pension funds for the Episcopal Church, has published the results of its recent audit of the historical links to slavery of CPG funds. The report can be found at the CPG website. Reporting on the release appears in the Episcopal New Service. The Church Pension fund endowment is one of the largest fifteen endowments in the world, and third largest if university endowments are excluded. The audit is a response to a general convention resolution calling for a forensic audit of the fund. However, the initial ENS reporting on the methodology employed in in the audit suggests that it is perhaps overly generous to suggest that it was "forensic." The researchers themselves admit that they did not research the majority of donors, ostensibly because their donations were small and it would have been a time-intensive process. That means that the official findings of "no" direct connection to slavery, and comparatively greater but still modest indirect links slavery, should be taken with a grain of salt. The producers of the study also readily admit that the donors were, almost without exception, White, and that the economic structures of society that enabled the accumulation of wealth by White Americans prior to and following the Civil War were deeply racist. As Patric Favreau, the Executive VP of CPG, noted (according to ENS reporting), "wealth accumulation for much of the 19th century cannot be separated from the economics of enslavement." This means that even as the overt connections to slavery discovered in the audit appear modest, the White wealth that provided the foundation for the Church Pension Fund, and its predecessor funds associated with the Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society, should be understood to be inextricably linked to racist processes of White wealth accumulation which functioned to prevent wealth accumulation by Black Americans.

Jolyon G. R. Pruszinski, Ph.D.
Reparations Commission Research Historian
Episcopal Diocese of New Jersey

Wednesday, May 8, 2024

VIDEO: Reparations Webinar Sponsored by NJ Faith Allies for Reparations, April 25, 2024

 

On April 25, 2024, the Diocese of New Jersey hosted a reparations webinar organized by New Jersey Faith Allies for Reparations entitled "Journey Toward Reparations: New Jersey's Opportunity to Learn from New York & California." Led by Reverend Charles Wynder, Jr., the panel discussion included insights from NY State Senator James Sanders, Jr., the Reverend Dr. Darrell Armstrong, and the Reverend Charles Boyer. 

Wednesday, May 1, 2024

NEWS: Stations of Reparations Service, St. Augustine's Asbury Park, NJ March 16, 2024

Figure 1: Stations of Reparations service, St. Augustine's Episcopal Church, Asbury Park, NJ, March 16, 2024.
Photo by Jolyon Pruszinski.

On Saturday March 16, 2024 the Reparations Commission of the Diocese of New Jersey sponsored its second annual Liturgy of Stations of Reparations, a Lenten service of repentance. Originally conceived by the Commission’s history working group, the service was a well-attended, broadly collaborative effort hosted by members of the influential, historically Black church, St. Augustine’s, Asbury Park, New Jersey. 
The first “Stations” service was held in March 2023 at St. Peter’s, Freehold, NJ, and brought together testimony from several churches that had researched their parish involvement with slavery. This second service focused on the Post-Civil War history of systemic racism and featured testimony from local Monmouth County Episcopal churches. This focus on systemic racism is itself rooted in New Jersey’s history of enslavement. A video recording of the service is available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_AvkWiK8ks
The core of the service was modeled on the traditional Stations of the Cross, in which, at each Station, a portion of the story of Jesus’ Passion is told within a repeating structure of prayer. However, instead of featuring the stories of Jesus’ Passion, the service lifted up stories related to systemic racism and injustice, as well as achievement and lived faith in the context of historically Black congregations. Interspersed with presentations of parish histories were poems that fostered reflection on the Black experience of racism and a sung refrain from “There is a Balm in Gilead.” Dr. Bennett Craft (organ and piano) and Sheila Harris Jackson (soloist) led the music for the service, while the Rev. Dr. William Ndishabandi, Priest in Charge at St. Augustine’s, the Rev. Chase Danford, Rector of Trinity, Asbury Park, and the Rt. Rev. Sally French, Bishop of the Diocese of New Jersey, presided.
The first station featured testimony from Ms. Linda Shomo of St. Augustine’s, Asbury Park, past president of the New Jersey chapter of the Union of Black Episcopalians. She told about the recent history of racism in Asbury Park through an explanation of governmental development choices and their economic and social impacts. She further detailed her experience of the strained racial relationship between St. Augustine’s and Trinity, Asbury Park. Her moving descriptions of the nurturing parish life at St. Augustine’s that sustained her through the difficulties of growing up in a town beset by racism were a testament to the faithfulness and persistence of the congregation.
The second station’s historical presentation came from Rev. Danford of Trinity Asbury Park. He described some of the early racist laws in Asbury Park, and noted that the initial benefactor of the church, James Bradley, created many of these policies. He described modest early ministry to local Black people in the late nineteenth century, but also the lack of relationship with St. Augustine’s throughout the twentieth century. Lately Trinity has formed a Racial Justice Audit team to examine its history of racism. While much work remains to be done, Danford described new policies in hiring, improved relationships beyond the White community of Asbury Park, and the diversification of depictions of Jesus in the sacred art at Trinity.
The third station was presented by Charles Hughes of St. Thomas’ Episcopal Church, Red Bank whose wife’s grandparents were among the founding members of St. Thomas. That first generation began meeting in a chapel which had fallen into disuse which was then owned by the White congregation of Trinity Episcopal Church, Red Bank. In the mid-twentieth century, when St. Thomas had grown dramatically and looked to expand, many neighboring White residents sought to prevent their building. The congregation prevailed against this racist resistance and managed to build their new church in Red Bank in the 1950’s, continuing to bless the community that had resisted its presence. St. Thomas has had a thriving ministry there ever since, including founding “Lunch Break” (https://lunchbreak.org) a critical social service organization in Red Bank providing food, clothing, job training, and more to those experiencing financial insecurity.
The fourth station featured a description of the larger diocesan history of racism occurring following the civil war and throughout the twentieth century by Reparations Commission Research Historian, Jolyon Pruszinski, Ph.D. This racism included long-standing White refusal to worship with Black Episcopalians, underfunding of Black churches, and even the closing of Black congregations to fund White ones. Then, during a time of quiet reflection and prayer, participants were invited to consider the stories told by the presenters and possible steps the Holy Spirit might be prompting in response. The Rev. Kevin Thompson, Deacon, St. Thomas, Red Bank closed the service saying: “The journey of reparations is long. Today we have taken one small step. Let us go forth in the Name of Christ to walk towards justice and healing.” A hearty reception afterward, hosted by St. Augustine parishioners, allowed for continued conversation and the sharing of personal stories.
        The Commission believes it is essential that these stories be told in many ways, not least in the context of worship. Further services are being planned for other regions of the diocese in subsequent years, and many churches in the diocese are beginning to look into the ways they have participated in enslavement and engaged in or benefitted from racism. Updates from the Reparations Commission can be found at https://dioceseofnj.org/commissions/reparations-commission/ and research updates concerning the diocese’s history regarding slavery and racism can be found at the Diocese of New Jersey Racial Justice Review website: https://dionj-racialjusticereview.blogspot.com.

Jolyon G. R. Pruszinski, Ph.D.
Reparations Commission Research Historian
Episcopal Diocese of New Jersey