Thursday, January 25, 2024

Rev. Dr. William Ridgeway, Nazi Sympathizer and Priest of St. Wilfrid’s, Camden (1930-1962)

St. Wilfrid's Episcopal Church, Camden, New Jersey (from The Episcopal Diocese of New Jersey 1785-1985: 
Forward with Christ, A Bicentennial Historical Book, page 49); and Rev. Dr. Ridgeway 
(from The Morning Post, Camden, New Jersey [April 30, 1935]: page 6, public domain)

The Diocese of New Jersey was home to many white supremacists during the early-to-mid twentieth century, and the long serving rector of St. Wilfrid’s Episcopal Church in Camden, New Jersey, the Rev. Dr. William Ridgeway, appears to have been among them. Ridgeway began his tenure at St. Wilfrid’s in 1930,[1] when the church and surrounding neighborhood were White. Early in his tenure he made a point of promoting a speaking engagement for a fellow priest, Rev. O. Steward Michael, who was promoting Hitler’s regime and Nazi actions. Details of the visit were covered by local newspapers.[2] Ridgeway allowed Michael to preside and preach at St. Wilfrid’s on many occasions and eventually conducted Michael’s funeral in 1942.[3]

            Ridgeway also managed to run St. Wilfrid’s nearly into the ground. Over the course of his three-decade career, church governance was lax, and accounting practices were remiss.[4] His own family took the offerings home with them “to count,”[5] but then insisted regularly that the church was not taking in enough to pay the rector’s salary fully. Ridgeway ruled the church with an authoritarian approach, excommunicating those who disagreed with him, and installing his own family members in most positions of authority. Eventually the financial irregularities and sclerotic disfunction overcame Ridgeway’s attempts at control, and upon his death in 1962 resulted in lawsuits and recriminations. The diocese instituted a financial housecleaning and covered key elements of the financial obligations that had been contentious; not however before the church received a great deal of bad press.[6] These difficult events did not, however, ultimately determine the destiny of the church.

As this challenging period of reckoning with financial irregularities was occurring during the 1960s, White flight from Camden was in full swing. Even though the parish had essentially corrected its finances by the end of the 1960s, in the ensuing decades most of the remaining White parishioners left St. Wilfrid’s and the city, though those who stayed integrated the church and ministered to the homeless. Changes in the church during Father Martin Gutwein’s tenure from 1983-1992 are indicative: “When he arrived, St. Wilfrid’s vestry was headed by a white man, [Bill Granahan, and] when he left the vestry leader was a black woman, [Enid Massias].”[7] In an interview with Father Gutwein about his time with the congregation he said: 

The Episcopal Churches in Camden were all changing as a response to the transformation in the city… Individuals were moving from one church to another, looking for a place that felt comfortable to them. Race and class played a role in where people felt welcome. Both Island Blacks and the American Blacks were moving to St. Wilfrid’s. There was a gentle shift happening, it was a lovely close-knit congregation, and they got along… [The preexisting White leadership that remained] was welcoming to the newer folks but, the parish was not financially self-sufficient, and members didn’t seem to think it was their job to fix that.[8]

Ultimately, what had begun as an exclusively White church in an exclusively White neighborhood had briefly become a racially integrated church ministering in a racially integrated neighborhood, and was then identified by the diocese as a “Black church” in the late 1980s.[9] Now largely consisting of Jamaican families ministering in a predominantly Hispanic neighborhood,[10] St. Wilfrid’s has persisted as a congregation even as systemically pervasive racism in housing and employment made life brutally difficult for many remaining Camden residents.[11]  

In spite of its difficult history, the St. Wilfrid’s community ministers faithfully in Camden to this day, and continues to provide a vital support to those in need: to those experiencing food insecurity through its critical food bank ministry, and to those needing health care through its regular clinic. Stephanie Fanjul’s parish history, written in 2019, is a poignant, and truly moving account.



Jolyon G. R. Pruszinski, Ph.D.
Reparations Commission Research Historian
Episcopal Diocese of New Jersey


[1] Much of this history is documented in a master’s thesis by Stephanie Fanjul, “St. Wilfrid’s Church: Fragments of the Soul of an Urban Church,” Capstone Project (2019), MSS held at Rubenstein Library, Duke University, and https://hdl.handle.net/10161/18575 (last accessed 1.10.24).

[2] Including the Courier-Post Newspaper on September 30, 1938.

[3] The Morning Post, May 12, 1942.

[4] According to statements by Senator Cowgill, lawyer for the diocese, recorded in the Vestry minutes of 1962-64, presented in Fanjul, “St. Wilfrid’s Church,” 112-13.

[5] Fanjul, “St. Wilfrid’s Church,” 104-5.

[6] E.g. Harry M. Potter, “Widow, Family Called ‘Squatters’ in Rectory, Are Ordered to Move,” Philadelphia Inquirer, February 22, 1964. See also Fanjul, “St. Wilfrid’s Church,” 113.

[7] Fanjul, “St. Wilfrid’s Church,” 129.

[8] As recorded in Fanjul, “St. Wilfrid’s Church,” 131.

[9] Fanjul, “St. Wilfrid’s Church,” 152.

[10] The neighborhood of Dudley, as of 2010 had become approximately 70% Hispanic. Fanjul, “St. Wilfrid’s Church,” 191.

[11] See Howard Gillette, Jr., Camden after the Fall: Decline and Renewal in a Post-Industrial City (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2005), 38-94; and Fanjul, “St. Wilfrid’s Church,” 136-139.

Tuesday, January 16, 2024

VIDEO: NJISJ "Faith and Black Resistance" in New Jersey, Public Session #3 Recording


 The New Jersey Institute for Social Justice has posted video from the third of nine public sessions sponsored by the New Jersey Reparations Council, held on January 11, 2024. The content deals with "Faith and Black Resistance" in New Jersey. Presenting scholars and activists include Jean-Pierre Brutus, Ryan Haygood, Maisha Simmons, Taja-Nia Henderson, Charles Boyer, Stephanie James-Harris, Imam W. Deen Shareef, Carol Lynn Patterson, and Timothy Adkins-Jones. There is also testimony offered by the Co-conveners of the Reparations Commission of the Episcopal Diocese of New Jersey, Canon Annette Buchanan (1:24:15) and Canon Barbie Bach (1:27:45).

Tuesday, January 9, 2024

NEWS: NJ Reparations Council Public Meeting #3 on "Faith & Black Resistance" Thursday 1/11/24 at 6:30pm


 The New Jersey Reparations Council, convened by the New Jersey Institute for Social Justice (NJISJ), will hold its third remote public meeting on Thursday January 11, 2023 at 6:30pm, Eastern time. The "Faith and Black Resistance" Committee will share about its work and receive input from stakeholders and community members. This will be the third of nine planned sessions. The first and second were excellent and this third one is of particular relevance for the work of the Diocese of New Jersey Racial Justice Review.

To watch only: Visit youtube.com/@dosocialjustice

 

To comment live during the event: Register at bit.ly/NJRCSession3 (link is case sensitive; copy and paste link into your browser). Commentary is limited to three minutes and should be related to Faith and Black Resistance in New Jersey.

 

To submit longer commentary: You may write, submit audio or video, or another form of commentary to be considered by Committee members at bit.ly/NJRCPublicComment (link is case sensitive; copy and paste link into your browser).

 

If you are not able to attend live, a recording will be made available after the event on the NJISJ youtube channel: youtube.com/@dosocialjustice


Monday, January 1, 2024

Bishop Scarborough's Convention Address of 1890: Staking out a Place for Black Churches in the Diocese of New Jersey

The Rt Rev. John Scarborough (1831-1914), from William Stevens PerryThe Bishops 
of the American Church, Past and Present (New York: The Christian Literature Co., 1897)
marked as public domain, more details on Wikimedia Commons.

In his diocesan convention address of 1890, Bishop John Scarborough discussed the place of African Americans in the ministry of the diocese. This was the first such public statement at a convention of the Diocese of New Jersey. Bishop Doane had at times mentioned St. Philip’s, Newark when it had been part of the diocese, and had spoken of the debt owed to that congregation by the rest of the diocese.[1] He had also invited support for the Episcopal mission to Liberia.[2] However, no bishop had previously mused in such a setting on the general state of ministry to Black people in the diocese, nor had any articulated a mandate or strategy for their incorporation into Episcopal life generally. This development constituted a significant step for an almost entirely White diocese, and the details of Scarborough’s statement indicate both the difficulties confronting Black Episcopal life in the diocese at that time, and the approach that would be taken in subsequent decades. He wrote:

Hitherto there has been little effort made on the part of our Church in this Diocese to reach the colored population, resident in and near its large cities. Formerly there was a feeble mission at Macedonia, near Eatontown, but it gradually died out, and the chapel is now used as a school-house. For some time past the Rev. Mr. Townsend, of St. John's, Camden, has had a most prosperous mission in that city, where the colored people are very numerous. It is named after the great Bishop of Hippo, St. Augustine, and its rapid growth has been both a revelation and a surprise to me. During the past year I confirmed forty-two in that modest chapel, and I venture to say the service was as reverent and hearty as any in the Diocese. If the work continues to grow and prosper, as it bids fair to do, I can see new responsibilities in it for the city and the Diocese. Why should we leave the colored people to the care of other Christian bodies? Liturgic worship and a well-ordered ritual are just suited to their temperament. And why should we send our money to the South to build churches and chapels when we have the same work at our own doors, and are leaving it undone? Clearly this work will soon outgrow the ability of a struggling parish to carry it on, and the question will force itself upon us: What are we going to do with that long list of communicants who have cast in their lot with us? We dare not leave them unshepherded, and we will not drive them into schism by cold neglect! We can solve the race problem very glibly for South Carolina and Georgia. Can we solve it for New Jersey? It may be said that in the Church of Christ there should be no distinction of race or color; that all should meet together and be one in the assembly of God's people, as well as one in hope and doctrine. But those most competent to judge are agreed that a separate place of worship is best for all interests. The colored folk will not attend where they are, perhaps, not made welcome, or feel themselves to be intruders. They prefer to worship by themselves, separate and apart from their white brethren. It may be that God is opening up for us here a new field for our missionary energy, to quicken and excite our enthusiasm. I dare say other cities might follow the example of Camden and organize missions for this neglected class—neglected certainly in our ministrations. They will be quick to respond to any effort, and will gladly take the hand out-stretched.[3]

 

From his statement we can learn a number of things about the state of affairs regarding Black ministry in the diocese at that time.

            Perhaps most obviously, he admits to the presence of racism in the diocese, suggesting that White Episcopalians do not welcome Black Christians into their churches. He states that this has resulted in broad “neglect” of African Americans in the efforts of the churches of the diocese, and that Black Christians have been “left” to the care of other denominations. He even highlights the common preference among White Episcopalians for giving what limited attention and resources can be mustered for solving race-related issues to addressing such problems elsewhere (e.g. the American South)[4] rather than in their own communities. 

Scarborough mentions some of the small attempts at ministry to African Americans in the diocese, though the “feeble”[5] ministry to the inhabitants of the Black settlement at Macedonia (in Tinton Falls) and the atypical outreach by Rev. Townsend to African Americans in Camden serve to prove the case of overall neglect rather than contradict it. These efforts also show the pattern of ministry to African Americans that was developing in the diocese: rather than produce integrated congregations, the predominant model (which had already begun to develop while slavery was fully legal) was one of segregated ministry.[6]

            Though acknowledging ingrained White racism in his churches, Bishop Scarborough did not openly denounce it, and his blanket assumptions about all African Americans appear to indicate that he too may have held certain prejudicial views.[7] Nevertheless, he insisted that the Episcopal Church in New Jersey no longer neglect ministry to Black Christians in the state, and he articulated what he saw to be a feasible path forward in spite of the obstacles presented by racist White congregations: increased diocesan support for dedicated Black missions, churches, and ministries. This model of segregated Black congregations would become the dominant mode of growth among Black congregants in the state through the subsequent decades.[8] Diocesan support for segregated Black Episcopal Churches also opened the door to the affirmation of ordained Black clergy in the diocese, begun through the invitation in 1903 by Bishop Scarborough to the Rev. August Jensen to minister in the segregated mission at St. Augustine’s, Asbury Park, but continued by many others thereafter.

 

Jolyon G. R. Pruszinski, Ph.D.

Reparations Commission Research Historian

Episcopal Diocese of New Jersey



[1] George W. Doane, Diocese of New Jersey: The Episcopal Address, to the Seventy-First Annual Convention, in Grace Church, Newark, Wednesday, May 31, 1854 (Burlington: Printed at the Gazette Office, 1854), 14.

[2] George W. Doane, Episcopal Address Delivered at the Convention of the Protestant Episcopal Church, in the State of New-Jersey; May 28, 1834 (Camden: Josiah Harrison, 1834), 33.

[3] The Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of New Jersey, Journal of the Proceedings of the One Hundred and Eighteenth Convention, Being the One Hundred and Fifth Year of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of New Jersey; Held in St. Mary’s Church, Burlington, Tuesday, May 6th, and Wednesday, May 7th, 1890. Together with Appendices and the Episcopal Address (Princeton: The Princeton Press, 1890), pp. 168-169.

[4] Priests at this time are thinking, in particular, of the debates in South Carolina and Georgia dioceses over whether to admit Black congregations with full rights. See David M. Reimers, “Negro Bishops and Diocesan Segregation in the Protestant Episcopal Church: 1870-1954,” Historical Magazine of the Protestant Episcopal Church 31.3 (1962): 232.

[5] Then shuttered.

[6] This was the default model throughout much of the Episcopal Church through at least 1955. See Harold L. Lewis, “Racial Concerns in the Episcopal Church Since 1973,” Anglican and Episcopal History 67.4 (1998): 468.

[7] As perhaps indicated by his universal statements about Black people’s “temperament” or that they are “quick to respond to any effort.” This latter comment expresses a particularly untethered sentiment given the generally acknowledged aversion many Black Americans have had to the Episcopal church in light of its “failure to take any definitive action” during the Civil War or Reconstruction which “spelt disaster for its already unenthusiastic mission among Black Americans.” On this issue see, for example, Robert A. Bennet, “Black Episcopalians: A History From The Colonial Period To The Present,” Historical Magazine of the Protestant Episcopal Church 43.3 (1974): 238-239.

[8] At the time of its publication in 1922, George F. Bragg’s History of the African-American Group of the Episcopal Church ([Baltimore: Church Advocate Press, 1922], 215) listed seven Black congregations in the Diocese of New Jersey ministering to 768 communicants.